in the future might be appropriate, where coverage in reliable sources is sufficient. And Wikipedia is certainly not for things made up one day. In addition, bear in mind that article talk pages exist solely to discuss how to improve articles; they are not for general discussion about the subject of the article, nor are they a help desk for obtaining instructions or technical assistance. If you have extra relevant images, consider uploading them to the Wikimedia Commons, where they can be linked from Wikipedia. They would greatly appreciate your help. Individual scheduled or expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place. Nominating the page for deletion if it meets propaganda techniques in today's advertising essay grounds for such action under the Deletion policy page. Rather, they document already existing community consensus regarding what should be accepted and what should be rejected. Before starting a potentially controversial project, 7 researchers should open discussion at the Village Pump to ensure it will not interfere with Wikipedia's mission.
For a list of deceased Wikipedians, see Wikipedia:Deceased Wikipedians. Editors in large disputes should work in good faith to find broad principles of agreement between different viewpoints. Although some topics, particularly those concerning current affairs and politics, may stir passions and tempt people to "climb soapboxes Wikipedia is not the medium for this. In the unusual situation where the opinions of an individual are important enough to discuss, it is preferable to let other people write about them. If a picture comes from a public domain source on a website, then consider adding it to Wikipedia:Images with missing articles or Wikipedia:Public domain image resources.